• J Gen Intern Med · Jul 2008

    A pilot study using nominal group technique to assess residents' perceptions of successful attending rounds.

    • Analia Castiglioni, Richard M Shewchuk, Lisa L Willett, Gustavo R Heudebert, and Robert M Centor.
    • Division of General Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. acastigl@uab.edu
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul 1; 23 (7): 1060-5.

    BackgroundWard attending rounds are fundamental for internal medicine residency training. An improved understanding of interns' and residents' perceptions of attending rounds should inform training programs and attending physicians.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess residents' perceptions of successful attending rounds.DesignWe convened two groups of interns and two groups of residents, to elicit their perceptions on attending rounds.SubjectsParticipants were recruited by e-mail and conference announcements from the 49 interns and 80 residents in the internal medicine and medicine-pediatrics residency programs.MeasurementsThe nominal group technique (NGT) uses a structured group process to elicit and prioritize answers to a carefully articulated question.Main ResultsSeven interns (14%) identified 27 success factors and ranked attending approachability and enthusiasm and high quality teaching as most important. A second group of six (12%) interns identified 40 detractors and ranked having "mean attendings," receiving disrespectful comments, and too long or too short rounds as the most significant detractors. Nine (11%) residents identified 32 success factors and ranked attention to length of rounds, house staff autonomy, and establishing goals/expectations as the most important success factors. A second group of six (8%) residents identified 34 detractors and ranked very long rounds, interruptions and time constraints, and poor rapport between team members as the most significant detractors).ConclusionsAlthough there was some overlap in interns' and residents' perceptions of attending rounds, interns identified interpersonal factors as the most important factors; whereas residents viewed structural factors as most important. These findings should assist attending physicians improve the way they conduct rounds targeting both interns and residents needs.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.