• Parthasarathy D Thirumala, Santhosh Kumar Mohanraj, Miguel Habeych, Kelley Wichman, Yue-Fang Chang, Paul Gardner, Carl Snyderman, Donald J Crammond, and Jeffrey Balzer.
• Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA ; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
• J Neurol Surg Rep. 2013 Jun 1; 74 (1): 43-50.

AbstractObjective To evaluate the value of free-run electromyography (f-EMG) monitoring of extraocular cranial nerves (EOCN) III, IV, and VI during expanded endonasal surgery (EES) of the skull base in reducing iatrogenic cranial nerve (CN) deficits. Design We retrospectively identified 200 patients out of 990 who had at least one EOCN monitored during EES. We further separated patients into groups according to the specific CN monitored. In each CN group, we classified patients who had significant (SG) f-EMG activity as Group I and those who did not as Group II. Results A total of 696 EOCNs were monitored. The number of muscles supplied by EOCNs that had SG f-EMG activity was 88, including CN III = 46, CN IV = 21, and CN VI = 21. There were two deficits involving CN VI in patients who had SG f-EMG activity during surgery. There were 14 deficits observed, including CN III = 3, CN IV = 2, and CN VI = 9 in patients who did not have SG f-EMG activity during surgery. Conclusions f-EMG monitoring of EOCN during EES can be useful in identifying the location of the nerve. It seems to have limited value in predicting postoperative neurological deficits. Future studies to evaluate the EMG of EOCN during EES need to be done with both f-EMG and triggered EMG.

2 keywords...

hide…