• R Haessler, D Schwender, U Leppmeier, S Klasing, F Rindfleisch, and K Peter.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Germany.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1993 Aug 1; 37 (6): 532-40.

AbstractThis is a prospective, open, randomized study comparing three different anaesthetic regimens with respect to haemodynamic stability (cardiac index and pressure measurements), ischaemia (ECG), and loss of awareness (midlatency auditory evoked potentials in 58 patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. Anaesthesia was based on fentanyl 0.01 mg kg-1 bw for induction and 0.8-2.0 mg h-1 in combination with nitrous oxide for maintenance before cardiopulmonary bypass and 0.2-0.6 mg h-1 without nitrous oxide during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Eighteen patients were anaesthetised with flunitrazepam 0.01 mg kg-1 bw for induction and received thereafter 1-2 mg h-1 for maintenance (group F). In 40 patients anaesthesia was induced with etomidate and maintained with either isoflurane 0.4-1.2 vol% (group I) or propofol 4-10 mg kg-1 bw h-1 (group P). Vasodilators and inotropes were used for haemodynamic control when needed. Haemodynamic variables and ECG were studied at five timepoints (awake; after induction before surgery; after sternotomy; before cardiopulmonary bypass; and 20 min after separation from bypass). During surgical stimulation, vasodilators were needed significantly more frequently in group F, than in groups I and P. Surgery and sternotomy caused an increase in SVI and APs/SV in all groups. Differences between the groups were only found for systemic pressures, which after sternotomy were lowest in group I and before cardiopulmonary bypass were highest in group F. After termination of bypass all groups showed an increase in HR and a decrease in SVI, SVR, and LVSWI compared to the awake state, while CI remained unchanged.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

38 keywords...

hide…