• J. Pediatr. Surg. · Oct 1993

    Comparative Study

    The efficacy of extracorporeal life support in premature and low birth weight newborns.

    • R B Hirschl, R E Schumacher, S N Snedecor, K C Bui, and R H Bartlett.
    • Extracorporeal Life Support Organization, Ann Arbor, MI.
    • J. Pediatr. Surg. 1993 Oct 1; 28 (10): 1336-40; discussion 1341.

    AbstractBased on data obtained early in the development of neonatal extracorporeal life support (ECLS), contraindications to the use of ECLS have included low estimated gestational age (EGA) and low birth weight (BW). However, multiple improvements in the technical and management aspects of neonatal ECLS have been implemented since those early data were evaluated. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to assess in the "modern era" the efficacy of prolonged extracorporeal support in premature and low birth weight newborns. Examination of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry showed that between 1988 and 1991 ECLS was utilized in 158 premature (PREM, EGA < or = 34 weeks), 4,128 full-term (FT, EGA > or = 35 weeks), 26 low birth weight (LBW, BW < 2.0 kg), and 4,333 normal birth weight (NBW, BW > or = 2.0 kg) patients with respiratory failure. Data were evaluated for variables thought to be associated with a decrease in survival or an increase in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). A logistic regression model was developed to evaluate the ability of EGA and BW to predict survival. The incidence of survival (SURV) was decreased (63% v 84%) and ICH increased (37% v 14%) significantly in PREM when compared with FT newborns (P < .001). However, respectable survival rates in PREM patients with EGA > 32 weeks were documented. In addition, both survival and ICH in PREM patients have improved substantially when compared with past reports (Past: SURV = 25% and ICH = 100%; current: SURV = 63% and ICH = 37%; ICH P < .001; SURV P = .056). Survival was significantly decreased in LBW when compared to NBW neonates (65% v 83%, P < .05), but there was no significant difference in ICH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.