• V Wenzel, K H Linder, S Augenstein, A W Prengel, and H U Strohmenger.
• Department of Anesthesiology, University of Ulm, Germany. Volker.Wenzel@uibk.ac.at
• Stroke. 1998 Jul 1; 29 (7): 1462-7; discussion 1467-8.

Background And PurposeIt is unknown whether a combination of vasopressin and epinephrine may be superior to vasopressin alone by targeting both nonadrenergic and adrenergic receptors.MethodsAfter 15 minutes of cardiac arrest (13 minutes of ventricular fibrillation and 2 minutes of pulseless electrical activity) and 3 minutes of chest compressions, 16 animals were randomly treated with either 0.8 U/kg vasopressin (n = 8) or 0.8 U/kg vasopressin combined with 200 microg/kg epinephrine (n = 8).ResultsComparison of vasopressin with vasopressin and epinephrine at 90 seconds and 5 minutes after drug administration resulted in comparable mean (+/-SEM) coronary perfusion pressure (54+/-3 versus 57+/-5 and 36+/-4 versus 35+/-4 mm Hg, respectively), cerebral perfusion pressure (59+/-6 versus 65+/-8 and 40+/-6 versus 39+/-6 mm Hg, respectively), and median (25th to 75th percentiles) left ventricular myocardial blood flow [116 (81 to 143) versus 108 (97 to 125) and 44 (35 to 81) versus 62 (42 to 74) mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1), respectively], but significantly increased (P<0.05) total cerebral blood flow [81 (77 to 95) versus 39 (34 to 58) and 50 (43 to 52) versus 28 (16 to 35) mL x min(-1) x 100 g(-1), respectively]. Return of spontaneous circulation rates in both groups were comparable (vasopressin, 7 of 8; vasopressin and epinephrine, 6 of 8).ConclusionsComparison of vasopressin with vasopressin and epinephrine resulted in comparable left ventricular myocardial blood flow but significantly increased cerebral perfusion.

15 keywords...

hide…