-
Ann Readapt Med Phys · Mar 2005
[Evaluation after four years of exercise therapy for chronic low back pain].
- S Verfaille, Y Delarue, S Demangeon, and F Beuret-Blanquart.
- Centre régional de médecine physique et de réadaptation ( les Herbiers ), CHU de Rouen, 111, rue Herbeuse, 76230 Bois-Guillaume, France.
- Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005 Mar 1; 48 (2): 53-60.
ObjectiveTo assess at four years follow-up the efficiency of exercise therapy for chronic low back pain in terms of pain, physical ability, quality of life and return to work.Materials And MethodsPatients who graduated from a functional restoration program between April 1997 and June 1999, answered a questionnaire at one year follow-up. The patients who had answered this questionnaire were evaluated 48 months later: they first answered another questionnaire and then most underwent a clinical examination assessing pain on a visual analogue scale, flexibility by use of the Schöber index and the finger-ground distance test, endurance of abdominal and spinal muscles, and quality of life as assessed by the Dallas pain questionnaire.ResultsThirty-four patients graduated from the program; 26 were studied at four-year follow-up. Pain intensity was significantly reduced. Improvement in flexibility after the program remained at four-year follow-up, whereas improvement in endurance did not. Scores on the Dallas pain questionnaire remained as improved as those at one-year follow-up. Initially, 23 of the 26 patients had a job; 19 were on sick leave for an average of 35 weeks. At four-year follow-up, 16 patients were still working, and 56% had changed jobs. Six patients pursued a regular activity before entering the program; at four-year follow-up, 17 were regularly active. No significant relationship was found between the pursuit of physical activity and return to work. Nevertheless, a significant relationship was found between having a regular physical activity and improvement of the finger-ground distance and endurance of spinal muscles. This observation was not true for the Dallas pain questionnaire scores.ConclusionDespite the lack of a control group, this study seems to favour a benefit in the functional restoration program.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.