• Peter Brann, Garry Walter, and Tim Coombs.
• Wundeela, Eastern Health CAMHS, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. timcoombs1@bigpond.com
• Australas Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 1; 19 (2): 125-32.

ObjectiveThis paper describes aspects of the child and adolescent benchmarking forums that were part of the National Mental Health Benchmarking Project (NMHBP). These forums enabled participating child and adolescent mental health organizations to benchmark themselves against each other, with a view to understanding variability in performance against a range of key performance indicators (KPIs).MethodSix child and adolescent mental health organizations took part in the NMHBP. Representatives from these organizations attended eight benchmarking forums at which they documented their performance against relevant KPIs. They also undertook two special projects designed to help them understand the variation in performance on given KPIs.ResultsThere was considerable inter-organization variability on many of the KPIs. Even within organizations, there was often substantial variability over time. The variability in indicator data raised many questions for participants. This challenged participants to better understand and describe their local processes, prompted them to collect additional data, and stimulated them to make organizational comparisons. These activities fed into a process of reflection about their performance.ConclusionsBenchmarking has the potential to illuminate intra- and inter-organizational performance in the child and adolescent context.

34 keywords...

hide…