• B Walder, P M Suter, and J A Romand.
• Department APSIC, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland. Bernard.Walder@hcuge.ch
• Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jan 1; 27 (1): 107-14.

ObjectivesProcessed EEG monitoring has been suggested for sedation depth evaluation in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The present study investigated the efficacy of two processed EEG monitors using SEF90% or SEF95% and BIS to differentiate between conscious (Ramsay score 4) and unconscious sedation (Ramsay score 6).Design And SettingProspective, randomized trial in a surgical ICU of a university teaching hospital.PatientsPatients recovering from elective coronary bypass grafting.InterventionOne of two EEG analyzers was installed (A: Aspect A-1000 measuring SEF95% and BIS; D: Drager pEEG measuring SEF90%). At ICU admission unconscious sedation (Ramsay score 6), and at three 30-min intervals conscious sedation (Ramsay score 4) were investigated.Measurements And ResultsFourteen patients were monitored by A and 14 by D. The interindividual variability (coefficient of variation 32-69 %) was large for all three processed EEG methods. SEF90% of analyzer D and BIS of analyzer A showed a statistically significant difference between unconscious and conscious sedation (11 +/- 3 and 17 +/- 6 Hz, p = 0.005; 74 +/- 10 and 83 +/- 10, p = 0.02). Positive and negative predictive values for SEF90% of analyzer D (0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.77; and 0.92, 95% CI 0.64-0.99) and BIS of analyzer A (0.55, 95 % CI 0.32-0.76; and 0.87, 95 % CI 0.60-0.98) were too low for discrimination between conscious and unconscious sedation.ConclusionsThe use of processed EEG monitoring cannot be recommended for assessing sedation depth after cardiac surgery.

17 keywords...

hide…