• Spine J · Jul 2006

    Comparative Study

    Do anterior interbody cages have a potential value in comparison to autogenous rib graft in the surgical management of Scheuermann's kyphosis?

    • R Arun, S M H Mehdian, Brian J C Freeman, J Sithole, and S C Divjina.
    • The Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom. arearoon@lycos.co.uk
    • Spine J. 2006 Jul 1; 6 (4): 413-20.

    Background ContextPrevious studies have analyzed the outcome following posterior correction and combined anterior-posterior correction for Scheuermann's kyphosis. Traditionally interbody fusion has been obtained using morselized rib graft. Recently the use of titanium anterior cages has been suggested for interbody use. There are no long-term studies comparing these two techniques.PurposeTo investigate the potential value of titanium anterior interbody cages compared with morselized rib graft for anterior interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation, correction, and fusion for Scheuermann's kyphosis.Study DesignNonrandomized comparison of two surgical techniques in matched subjects.Patient SampleFifteen patients with identical preoperative radiographic and physical variables (age, gender, height, weight, body mass index) were managed with combined anterior release, interbody fusion, posterior instrumentation, correction, and fusion. Group A (n=8) had morselized rib graft inserted into each intervertebral disc space. Group B (n=7) had titanium interbody cages packed with bone graft inserted at each level. The posterior instrumentation extended from T2 to L2 in both groups.Outcome MeasuresPreoperative and postoperative curve morphometry was studied on plain radiographs by two independent observers. The indices studied included Cobb angle, Ferguson's angle, Voutsinas index, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), sacral inclination (SI), and lumbar lordosis (LL). Interbody fusion was assessed at final follow-up. Each patient was reviewed at 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 60 months after surgery with standing radiographs.MethodsBoth surgical groups were compared in terms of radiological parameters and complications. Wilcoxon-matched pairs test and Mann-Whitney test were used.ResultsThe average follow-up for Group A was 70 months and for Group B 66 months. For the whole group, the preoperative median Cobb angle for thoracic kyphosis was 86 degrees , the median Ferguson angle was 50 degrees , Voutsinas index was 28.7, SVA -3.5 centimeters, lumbar lordosis was 66 degrees , and the median sacral inclination angle was 40 degrees . The median postoperative Cobb angle was 42 degrees , Ferguson angle 28.4 degrees , Voutsinas index 13, SVA -4.0 centimeters, and the median sacral inclination angle was 34 degrees . There were significant differences between preoperative and postoperative measurements for all variables (p<.01), indicating that good correction was achieved. At 4-year follow-up, fusion criteria were satisfied in 12 of 15 cases (80%). Three patients had distal junctional kyphosis. There was no significant difference obtained in the final Cobb angle, Ferguson angle, and Voutsinas index when Group A (rib graft) was compared with Group B (titanium cage) Both Group A and B patients retained the postoperative correction achieved with respect to all the radiographic parameters studied.ConclusionWe were unable to demonstrate any significant advantage for the use of anterior titanium interbody cages over the use of morselized rib graft in the surgical management of Scheuermann's kyphosis. Given the not inconsiderable cost and the need for posterior chevron osteotomies when interbody cages are used, we have now reverted to our previous practice of using morselized rib graft at each intervertebral level.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…