• Jin-gao Wang, De-quan Kong, Zi-li Zhang, Ji-yi Huang, Xiang-mei Yu, Cheng-bin Yang, Xiao-wen Pan, and Yan Huang.
• Emergency Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361003, China. wjg03@163.com
• Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Oct 12; 90 (37): 2607-10.

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of D-dimer contents in peripheral blood for monitoring the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) cardiopulmonary resuscitation after cardiac arrest.MethodsForty-seven patients with sudden cardiac arrest received CPR according to 2005 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines for CPR and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC). At the early stage of ROSC, those patients underwent head and breast CT scan if they were in a state of unconsciousness and had unstable vital signs. If intracranial hemorrhage, dissection of aorta and pneumothorax were rule out, and those patients who maintained blood circulation for over 24 hours were included. The expression of D-dimer contents in peripheral blood was determined at 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 h after CPR in all patients. And the patients were randomly divided into control and experiment groups. Prior to thrombolysis, the patients whose D-dimer more than 512 µg/L were classified as Group A (n = 17); those whose D-dimer below 512 µg/L Group B (n = 14); and the remaining control group whose family members refused thrombolytic therapy Group C (n = 16). The general data, Glasgow coma scale, survival rate and the change of D-dimer in peripheral blood were analyzed.ResultsIn Group A, D-dimer level began to increase significantly at CPR 1 hour. It peaked at CPR 2 hours then decreased gradually. The final survival rate was 67%. The survival rate and GCS were higher than those of Groups B and C. In Group B, the D-dimer concentrations began to increase gradually at CPR1 hour, peaked at CPR 12 hours and then decreased. The survival rate and GCS was lower than those of Group A and similar to those of Group C. Group C was control group with no thrombolysis.ConclusionFor those ROSC patients with D-dimer concentrations significantly higher than usual, the pathogenesis of cardiac arrest may be concerned with thromboembolism, thrombosis in circulatory system and hyperviscosity. After an initiation of thrombolytic therapy, blocked blood vessels are recanalized, blood circulation improves and the cause of cardiac arrest is removed. Thus their survival rate becomes better. For those with D-dimer concentrations no higher than usual, the cause of cardiac arrest is not concerned with thromboembolism, thrombolytic therapy can not improve the patient outcome. And the final survival rate remains unchanged. The significance of thrombolytic therapy is none.

15 keywords...

hide…