• Injury · Jul 2016

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Traction table versus manual traction in the intramedullary nailing of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A prospective randomized trial.

    • Ercan Şahin, Murat Songür, Mahmut Kalem, Sinan Zehir, Mehmet Atıf Erol Aksekili, Selçuk Keser, and Ahmet Bayar.
    • Bülent Ecevit University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics& Traumatology, Zonguldak, Turkey. Electronic address: dr_erc_sah@yahoo.com.tr.
    • Injury. 2016 Jul 1; 47 (7): 1547-54.

    IntroductionThe purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare traction table with manual traction for the reduction and nailing of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.DesignProspective, randomized, two-center trial.Materials And Methods72 elderly patients with AO/OTA 31A2 and 31A3 proximal femur fractures were randomized to undergo surgery with either manual traction (MT) or traction table (TT) facilitated intramedullary nailing. The demographics and fracture characteristics, duration of preparation and surgery, total anaesthesia time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, number of assistants, early post-operative radiological evaluations and 6th month functional and radiological outcomes were evaluated. Data of 64 patients attending 6th month follow-up examination were evaluated statistically.ResultsNo significant differences were observed between groups regarding demographics and fracture characteristics. In the manual traction group, there was a significant time gain in respect of the positioning and preparation period (18.0±1.6min in MT group, 29.0±2.4min in TT group) (p<0.05). In terms of total anaesthesia time (Preparation+surgery) approximately 6min of difference was observed in favor of MT group (72.8±14.0min for MT and 78.6±6.5min for TT, [p<0.05]). Median number of assistants needed was significantly lower in TT group (2 assistants [1-3]) in MT group and (1 assistant [1,2]) in TT group [p<0.05]). There was no significant difference between two groups regarding other surgical and outcome parameters.ConclusionsManual traction reduced the preparation time and total anaesthesia duration, despite an increase in number of surgical assistant.Level Of EvidenceLevel II.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.