• Am. J. Surg. · Sep 1999

    Diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of blunt carotid arterial injuries.

    • R R Kraus, J M Bergstein, and J R DeBord.
    • Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, USA.
    • Am. J. Surg. 1999 Sep 1; 178 (3): 190-3.

    BackgroundBlunt carotid injuries are rare, and present late with devastating strokes. A sizeable single-institution descriptive report could help characterize the injury and its diagnosis and treatment.MethodWe performed a retrospective review of blunt carotid artery injuries from May 1988 to December 1997 at a level I trauma center. Chart review consisted of demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, diagnostic modalities, initial neurologic status, treatment, and outcome. Discharge outcome was classified as "good" (normal-mild deficit), "fair" (needing daily assistance), "poor" (institutionalized), or "dead."ResultsDuring the study period 16 patients sustained a carotid artery injury. Mean age was 35 years and 63% were female. Vehicular trauma was the most common mechanism of injury (81%), followed by assaults (13%). Dissection was the most common injury (75%), with one quarter having an associated pseudoaneurysm. Initial neurologic presentation was normal in 31% and Glasgow Coma Score was < 13 in 31% (including 13% in coma). Eventual hemispheric symptoms developed in 81%. Associated injuries were present in 94%, commonly head (44%) and chest (50%). Duplex ultrasound accurately identified the injury in all patients (5 of 5) when used. Anticoagulation (88%) had no complications. Observation and therapeutic embolization each resulted in 1 fatal stroke. A third patient, with worsening deficits on heparin, died after carotid ligation, for an overall mortality of 19%. There were no deaths in the 13 patients treated by anticoagulation alone. Six patients (38%) had a "good" neurologic outcome, five (31%) "fair," and two (13%) "poor." Initial neurologic presentation, associated injuries, and mechanism of injury did not appear to correlate with these outcome categories.ConclusionsThese uncommon injuries should be suspected in the presence of head and/or chest injuries, basilar skull fracture, or coma (particularly if the computed tomography scan is unremarkable). Presentation may be varied, but most patients eventually develop hemispheric symptoms. Duplex ultrasound detects many of these injuries, but this does not demonstrate its utility as a screening tool. Anticoagulant therapy appears to be associated with a better outcome than expectant or occlusive therapy.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.