• Surgery today · Aug 2010

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of the classic Limberg flap and modified Limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective analysis of 416 patients.

    • Murat Akin, Sezai Leventoglu, B Bulent Mentes, Hasan Bostanci, Hakan Gokbayir, Kadir Kilic, Ersin Ozdemir, and Zafer Ferahkose.
    • Department of General Surgery, Gazi University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
    • Surg. Today. 2010 Aug 1; 40 (8): 757-62.

    PurposePilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is usually seen on the sacrococcygeal region in adolescent patients. The current study analyzed the outcome of the rhomboid excision and the Limberg flap procedure (cLF) in comparison to the modified Limberg flap procedure (mlF) for PSD.MethodsFour hundred and sixteen patients with PSD were operated on under spinal or general anesthesia by cLF and mlF. The patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1, cLF was performed on 211 patients. In Group 2, mlF was performed on 205 patients.ResultsNo significant difference was detected between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of sex, age, preoperative disease period, follow-up time, the mean hospital stay, and hypoesthesia. The mlF group had better clinical results than the cLF group. The recurrence rate was statistically higher in the cLF group 1 than in the mlF group (P = 0.036). The time to return to work, time to walk without pain, and time to be able to sit on the toilet without pain were longer in the cLF group (P = 0.001). The maceration and wound infection rate were statistically higher in the cLF group than in the mlF group (P = 0.020 and P = 0.019, respectively).ConclusionThe mlF is a more effective treatment than cLF for the surgical management of PSD.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…