• Gastrointest. Endosc. · Feb 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Prospective, randomized, single-center trial comparing double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel disorders.

    • Insa Messer, Andrea May, Hendrik Manner, and Christian Ell.
    • Department of Internal Medicine II, HSK Wiesbaden (Teaching Hospital of the University of Mainz), Wiesbaden, Germany.
    • Gastrointest. Endosc. 2013 Feb 1; 77 (2): 241-9.

    BackgroundDouble-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is an established method in diagnostic and therapeutic small-bowel enteroscopy.ObjectiveSpiral enteroscopy (SE) appears to be a promising new technique. A randomized, prospective study was conducted to compare both methods.DesignRandomized, prospective study.SettingSingle tertiary referral center.PatientsBetween September 2009 and March 2011, 26 patients with suspected mid-GI disorders completed the study.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to DBE or SE. The oral examination was conducted first, with the deepest point reached being marked with India ink. An additional anal examination followed the day after, with the aim of reaching the ink mark.Main Outcome MeasurementsThe primary endpoint of the study was the rate of complete enteroscopies achieved.ResultsThe rate of complete enteroscopies with DBE was 12 times the rate achieved with SE (8% in the SE group and 92% in the DBE group; P = .002). With regard to the secondary study criteria, much longer examination times but greater depths of insertion were associated with DBE. There were no statistically significant differences in the diagnostic or therapeutic outcomes between the SE and DBE groups (diagnostic yield, P = .428; therapeutic yield, P = 1.0; Fisher exact test). One perforation occurred during an anal examination as a relevant adverse event in SE.LimitationsSingle-center study, small sample size.ConclusionSE does not represent an alternative to DBE with regard to the depth of insertion or the rate of complete enteroscopies achieved. However, SE is advantageous in that it involves significantly shorter examination times. Further technical improvements will be necessary before SE can compete with DBE for complete enteroscopies.Copyright © 2013 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.