• Resuscitation · Apr 1989

    Comparative Study

    Comparisons of French and U.S.A. pediatric intensive care units.

    • A L Davis, M M Pollack, M Cloup, I Cloup, and J D Wilkinson.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital National Medical Center, Washington, D.C. 20010.
    • Resuscitation. 1989 Apr 1; 17 (2): 143-52.

    AbstractConsecutive admissions to two pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in France (n = 93) and the United States (n = 248) were compared using admission demographics, and daily therapeutic and severity of illness data. Analysis of the major demographic characteristics revealed that patients in the French PICU were younger (median age; 3 months vs. 31 months, P less than 0.001), and more commonly admitted for emergency reasons (92% vs. 66%, P less than 0.05). General resource utilization was similar in both units. However, important differences in the incidences of use of individual monitoring and therapeutic modalities were present. The United States PICU had higher incidences of invasive monitoring modalities (arterial catheters, 66% vs. 4%, P less than 0.001; central venous catheters, 38% vs. 11%, P less than 0.001; pulmonary artery catheters, 8% vs. 1%, P less than 0.01), while the French PICU had higher incidences of labor-intensive monitoring modalities (strict input/output, 75% vs. 47%, P less than 0.0001; greater than 3 stat blood studies/shift, 69% vs. 45%, P less than 0.0001). Patients in France were more likely to receive mechanical ventilation (81% vs. 56%, P less than 0.0001) and nutritional support (40% vs. 7%, P less than 0.05). Mortality rates in both PICUs were similar and accurately predicted by admission-day severity of illness scores. We conclude that differential resource utilization, possibly arising from different care philosophies, may result in equivalent care.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…