-
The Journal of pediatrics · Oct 1993
Comparative StudyGrowth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants with intrauterine growth retardation: comparison with control subjects matched by birth weight and gestational age.
- I K Sung, B Vohr, and W Oh.
- Department of Pediatrics, St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
- J. Pediatr. 1993 Oct 1; 123 (4): 618-24.
AbstractEighty-one very low birth weight (VLBW) infants were followed for 3 years to assess the relative impact of intrauterine growth retardation on growth and development; 27 small for gestational age (SGA) infants were compared with 27 gestation-matched infants with appropriate size for gestational age (AGA) and 27 birth weight-matched AGA infants. It was hypothesized that growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in SGA VLBW infants are poorer than those of AGA gestation-matched (AGA-GA) infants but do not differ from those of birth weight-matched (AGA-BW) control infants. Gestational ages of the SGA, AGA-GA, and AGA-BW infants were 29 +/- 2, 29 +/- 1, 26 +/- 2 weeks, and birth weights were 821 +/- 178, 1124 +/- 85, and 848 +/- 141 gm, respectively. The SGA infants did not differ from the AGA infants in neonatal course, but AGA weight-matched infants had lower Apgar scores and more days of assisted ventilation, and an increased incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and seizures. At 3 years of age the SGA VLBW infants had lower weight and height than both comparison groups (p < 0.05). Neurologic outcome in SGA infants did not differ from that in AGA-GA infants. The AGA-BW infants had an increased incidence of suspect or abnormal neurologic findings at 2 and 3 years of age (p < 0.05). The SGA infants scored lower on developmental tests at 1, 2, and 3 years than AGA-GA infants but had scores similar to those of the AGA-BW group. We conclude that intrauterine growth retardation in VLBW infants has a significant long-term impact on growth. Although 3-year development of SGA infants is significantly lower than that of gestation-matched control infants, it does not differ from that of weight-matched control infants.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.