• Houman Charani, Torben Wisborg, Kari Schrøder Hansen, Guttorm Brattebø, and Liv Berit Stenseth.
• Ortopedisk avdeling, Hammerfest sykehus.
• Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 2003 Oct 23; 123 (20): 2881-3.

BackgroundThe primary examination of a seriously injured patient is often done according to the Advanced Trauma Life Support concept. This concept calls for routine x-rays of the chest, pelvis and cervical spine. We have seen a tendency in Norway towards selective use of the pelvic film according to trauma mechanism and physical findings, even in patients with multiple traumas.Material And MethodsFour cases illustrate the risk of missing serious injuries in patients with multiple injuries if routine pelvic x-ray is omitted. A review of the literature confirms that routine pelvic x-ray may be omitted only if the patient is alert, has a negative physical pelvic examination, and no other distracting painful injuries.InterpretationEarly x-ray of the pelvis should still be a routine in patients with multiple injuries, but may be omitted in patients with normal consciousness, no distracting painful injuries and no pain on examination of the pelvis.

20 keywords...

hide…