• West J Emerg Med · Sep 2015

    Identifying Patient Door-to-Room Goals to Minimize Left-Without-Being-Seen Rates.

    • Shea Pielsticker, Lori Whelan, Annette O Arthur, and Stephen Thomas.
    • University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
    • West J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep 1; 16 (5): 611-8.

    IntroductionEmergency department (ED) patients in the leave-without-being-seen (LWBS) group risk problems of inefficiency, medical risk, and financial loss. The goal at our hospital is to limit LWBS to <1%. This study's goal was to assess the influence on LWBS associated with prolonging intervals between patient presentation and placement in an exam room (DoorRoom time). This study's major aim was to identify DoorRoom cutoffs that maximize likelihood of meeting the LWBS goal (i.e. <1%).MethodsWe conducted the study over one year (8/13-8/14) using operations data for an ED with annual census~50,000. For each study day, the LWBS endpoint (i.e. was LWBS<1%: "yes or no") and the mean DoorRoom time were recorded. We categorized DoorRoom means by intervals starting with ≤10min and ending at >60 min. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess for DoorRoom cutoffs predicting high LWBS, while adjusting for patient acuity (triage scores and admission %) and operations parameters. We used predictive marginal probability to assess utility of the regression-generated cutoffs. We defined statistical significance at p<0.05 and report odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsUnivariate results suggested a primary DoorRoom cutoff of 20', to maintain a high likelihood (>85%) of meeting the LWBS goal. A secondary DoorRoom cutoff was indicated at 35', to prevent a precipitous drop-off in likelihood of meeting the LWBS goal, from 61.1% at 35' to 34.4% at 40'. Predictive marginal analysis using multivariate techniques to control for operational and patient-acuity factors confirmed the 20' and 35' cutoffs as significant (p<0.001). Days with DoorRoom between 21-35' were 74% less likely to meet the LWBS goal than days with DoorRoom≤20' (OR 0.26, 95% CI [0.13-0.53]). Days with DoorRoom>35' were a further 75% less likely to meet the LWBS goal than days with DoorRoom of 21-35' (OR 0.25, 95% CI [0.15-0.41]).ConclusionOperationally useful DoorRoom cutoffs can be identified, which allow for rational establishment of performance goals for the ED attempting to minimize LWBS.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.