• J Trauma · Oct 1996

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of nonbronchoscopic techniques with bronchoscopic brushing in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

    • P D Wearden, A Chendrasekhar, and G A Timberlake.
    • Department of Surgery, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, USA.
    • J Trauma. 1996 Oct 1; 41 (4): 703-7.

    ObjectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative cultures obtained via nonbronchoscopic protected specimen brushing (PSB) and nonbronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) compared with quantitative cultures obtained by bronchoscopic PSB in surgical patients suspected of ventilator-associated pneumonia.DesignProspective, crossover controlled study of 15 ventilated surgical intensive care unit patients in a university teaching hospital.MethodsFifteen consecutive ventilated patients suspected of ventilator-associated pneumonia on the basis of leukocytosis, purulent sputum, and appearance of chest roentgenogram were enrolled. All patients underwent nonbronchoscopic PSB and BAL followed by bronchoscopic PSB. The duration of each procedure was noted. Culture results were considered positive only if greater than 10(4) colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter were present.Main ResultsPerfect concordance was noted between bronchoscopic PSB and nonbronchoscopic BAL (kappa = 1.0). The concordance between bronchoscopic PSB and nonbronchoscopic PSB was 93% ((kappa = 0.86). The nonbronchoscopic procedures were performed in significantly less time than the bronchoscopic procedure.ConclusionNonbronchoscopic PSB and BAL provide similar microbiologic data to bronchoscopic PSB in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia while shortening procedure time significantly.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…