• Critical care medicine · Mar 2015

    Review Meta Analysis

    The Efficacy and Safety of Heparin in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

    • Ryan Zarychanski, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Salmaan Kanji, Alexis F Turgeon, Anand Kumar, Donald S Houston, Emily Rimmer, Brett L Houston, Lauralyn McIntyre, Alison E Fox-Robichaud, Paul Hébert, Deborah J Cook, Dean A Fergusson, and Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.
    • 1Section of Critical Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 2Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 3George & Fay Yee Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba/Winnipeg Regional Health Authority, Winnipeg, MB, Canada. 4Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Department of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada. 5Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Centre de recherche CHU de Québec (CHU de Québec Research Center)-Enfant-Jésus Hospital, Axe Santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé (Population Health and Optimal Health Practices Unit), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada. 6Department of Internal Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada. 7Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada. 8Department of Medicine, Thrombosis and Atherosclerosis Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 9Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 10Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
    • Crit. Care Med.. 2015 Mar 1;43(3):511-8.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of heparin in patients with sepsis, septic shock, or disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with infection.DesignSystematic review and metaanalysis.Data SourcesRandomized controlled trials from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Global Health, Scopus, Web of Science, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to April 2014), conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles.Study Selection And Data ExtractionTwo reviewers independently identified and extracted trial-level data from randomized trials investigating unfractionated or low molecular heparin administered to patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, septic shock, or disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with infection. Internal validity was assessed in duplicate using the Risk of Bias tool. The strength of evidence was assessed in duplicate using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. Our primary outcome was mortality. Safety outcomes included hemorrhage, transfusion, and thrombocytopenia.Measurements And Main ResultsWe included nine trials enrolling 2,637 patients. Eight trials were of unclear risk of bias and one was classified as having low risk of bias. In trials comparing heparin to placebo or usual care, the risk ratio for death associated with heparin was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.77-1.00; I2 = 0%; 2,477 patients; six trials; moderate strength of evidence). In trials comparing heparin to other anticoagulants, the risk ratio for death was 1.30 (95% CI, 0.78-2.18; I2 = 0%; 160 patients; three trials; low strength of evidence). In trials comparing heparin to placebo or usual care, major hemorrhage was not statistically significantly increased (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.53-1.17; I2 = 0%; 2,392 patients; three trials). In one small trial of heparin compared with other anticoagulants, the risk of major hemorrhage was significantly increased (2.14; 95% CI, 1.07-4.30; 48 patients). Important secondary and safety outcomes, including minor bleeding, were sparsely reported.ConclusionsHeparin in patients with sepsis, septic shock, and disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with infection may be associated with decreased mortality; however, the overall impact remains uncertain. Safety outcomes have been underreported and require further study. Increased major bleeding with heparin administration cannot be excluded. Large rigorous randomized trials are needed to evaluate more carefully the efficacy and safety of heparin in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.