-
Comparative Study
Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.
- Won-Ik Cho and Ung-Kyu Chang.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Science, Seoul, Korea.
- J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Feb 1; 14 (2): 177-83.
ObjectDifferentiation between malignant and benign vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) is important but sometimes difficult, especially in elderly cancer patients. The authors investigated the findings of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT for the differentiation of VCFs.MethodsBetween 2007 and 2008, the authors evaluated and treated 102 VCFs in 96 patients. The final diagnosis, based on biopsy results or clinical follow-up, was benign fracture in 67 lesions in 65 patients and malignant fracture in 35 lesions in 31 patients. Magnetic resonance images were obtained in all patients, and FDG-PET/CT was performed in 17 patients in the benign fracture group and 20 in the malignant fracture group. The prevalence of 3 significant MR imaging findings (posterior cortical bulging, epidural mass formation, and pedicle enhancement) and the presence of radiotracer uptake on FDG-PET/CT were evaluated in the 2 groups. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) on FDG-PET/CT was compared between the 2 groups, and diagnostic threshold value was sought to confirm malignancy. The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT was compared in the differentiation of malignant from benign VCFs.ResultsPosterior cortical bulging was seen in 26 (74%) of 35 malignant lesions and 30 (45%) of 67 benign ones, epidural mass formation in 27 (77%) of the malignant lesions and 25% of the benign ones, and pedicle enhancement in 30 (91%) of the 33 malignant lesions and 18 (39%) of the 46 benign ones evaluated with Gd-enhanced MR imaging. These differences were statistically significant for each feature. Sensitivity and specificity for predicting malignancy were, respectively, 74% and 55% for posterior cortical bulging, 77% and 74% for epidural mass formation, and 90% and 61% for pedicle enhancement. Simultaneous occurrence of 3 significant features was found in 21 (64%) of the 33 malignant and 8 (17%) of the 46 benign lesions for which complete MR imaging data were available and showed sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 83%. The presence of radiotracer uptake on FDG-PET/CT was seen in all 20 (100%) of the 20 malignant lesions and 12 (71%) 17 of the benign lesions evaluated by FDG-PET/CT and showed a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 29%. There was a significant difference in mean (± SD) SUV(max) for the malignant (6.29 ± 3.50) and benign (2.38 ± 1.90) lesions (p < 0.001). The most reliable threshold for SUV(max) was found to be 4.25, which yielded a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 71%.ConclusionsWhen MR imaging findings are equivocal, FDG-PET/CT can be considered as an adjunctive diagnostic method for differentiating malignant from benign VCFs. In comparison with MR imaging, FDG-PET/CT showed slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.