• A Slowther, G A Lewando Hundt, J Purkis, and R Taylor.
• Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. a-m.slowther@warwick.ac.uk
• J R Soc Med. 2012 Apr 1; 105 (4): 157-65.

ObjectiveTo explore the experience of non-UK-qualified doctors in working within the regulatory framework of the General Medical Council (GMC) document Good Medical Practice.DesignIndividual interviews and focus groups.SettingUnited Kingdom.ParticipantsNon-UK-qualified doctors who had registered with the GMC between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2008, doctors attending training/induction programmes for non-UK-qualified doctors, and key informants involved in training and support for non-UK-qualified doctors.Main Outcome MeasuresThemes identified from analysis of interview and focus group transcripts.ResultsInformation and support for non-UK qualified doctors who apply to register to work in the UK has little reference to the ethical and professional standards required of doctors working in the UK. Recognition of the ethical, legal and cultural context of UK healthcare occurs once doctors are working in practice. Non-UK qualified doctors reported clear differences in the ethical and legal framework for practising medicine between the UK and their country of qualification, particularly in the model of the doctor-patient relationship. The degree of support for non-UK-qualified doctors in dealing with ethical concerns is related to the type of post they work in. European doctors describe similar difficulties with working in an unfamiliar regulatory framework to their non-European colleagues.ConclusionsNon-UK-qualified doctors experience a number of difficulties related to practising within a different ethical and professional regulatory framework. Provision of information and educational resources before registration, together with in-practice support would help to develop a more effective understanding of GMP and its implications for practice in the UK.

24 keywords...

hide…