• BMJ · Jan 2011

    Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis.

    • Allison Lipitz-Snyderman, Donald Steinwachs, Dale M Needham, Elizabeth Colantuoni, Laura L Morlock, and Peter J Pronovost.
    • Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. alipitz@jhsph.edu
    • BMJ. 2011 Jan 1; 342: d219.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate whether implementation of the Michigan Keystone ICU project, a comprehensive statewide quality improvement initiative focused on reduction of infections, was associated with reductions in hospital mortality and length of stay for adults aged 65 or more admitted to intensive care units.DesignRetrospective comparative study, using data from Medicare claims.SettingMichigan and Midwest region, United States. Population The study period (October 2001 to December 2006) spanned two years before the project was initiated to 22 months after its implementation. The study sample included hospital admissions for patients treated in 95 study hospitals in Michigan (238,937 total admissions) compared with 364 hospitals in the surrounding Midwest region (1,091,547 total admissions).Main Outcome MeasuresHospital mortality and length of hospital stay.ResultsThe overall trajectory of mortality outcomes differed significantly between the two groups upon implementation of the project (Wald test χ(2) = 8.73, P = 0.033). Reductions in mortality were significantly greater for the study group than for the comparison group 1-12 months (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.87 v 0.88, 0.85 to 0.90, P = 0.041) and 13-22 months (0.76, 0.72 to 0.81 v 0.84, 0.81 to 0.86, P = 0.007) after implementation of the project. The overall trajectory of length of stay did not differ significantly between the groups upon implementation of the project (Wald test χ(2) = 2.05, P = 0.560). Group differences in adjusted length of stay compared with baseline did not reach significance during implementation of the project (-0.45 days, 95% confidence interval -0.62 to -0.28 v -0.35, -0.52 to -0.19) or during post-implementation months 1-12 (-0.59, -0.80 to -0.37 v -0.42, -0.59 to -0.25) and 13-22 (-0.67, -0.91 to -0.43 v -0.54, -0.72 to -0.37).ConclusionsImplementation of the Keystone ICU project was associated with a significant decrease in hospital mortality in Michigan compared with the surrounding area. The project was not, however, sufficiently powered to show a significant difference in length of stay.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…