-
Case Reports
Routine chest X-ray is not mandatory after fluoroscopy-guided totally implantable venous access device insertion.
- Theodoros Thomopoulos, Jeremy Meyer, Wojciech Staszewicz, Ilias Bagetakos, Max Scheffler, Antoine Lomessy, Christian Toso, Christoph D Becker, and Philippe Morel.
- Division of Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: theodoros.thomopoulos@hcuge.ch.
- Ann Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb 1; 28 (2): 345-50.
BackgroundThe aim of this study is to determine whether systematic postoperative chest X-ray is required after totally implantable venous access port device (TIVAD) placement under fluoroscopic control.MethodsA retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients with fluoroscopy-guided TIVAD insertion from July 10, 2009 to April 16, 2012 was conducted at the Geneva University Hospitals (n = 927). Patients with an available postoperative chest X-ray were included, regardless of approach (open or percutaneous) and venous access site (subclavian, cephalic, jugular, etc.). Exclusion criteria were incomplete data and preexisting pneumothorax or hemothorax.ResultsEight hundred ninety-one patients were included. First-intention venous cutdown was performed in 878 patients (98.5%), with success rates of 79.4% and 88.2% when targeting the left and right cephalic veins, respectively. Percutaneous access was the chosen first-intention procedure for 12 patients (1.3%). Eight-hundred thirty-six (93.8%) insertions were performed only by the open approach and 53 (5.9%) implantations required at least one venous puncture. Two implantations were performed using previous central venous accesses. Immediate complications associated with TIVAD placement and detected on the postoperative chest X-ray consisted of 1 asymptomatic pneumothorax, 1 symptomatic hemothorax, and 2 malpositions of the catheter. One additional pneumothorax was discovered during the first night after TIVAD insertion in a patient who became symptomatic.ConclusionsThe very low incidence of immediate complications detected by postprocedural chest X-ray suggests that such a control is not mandatory as a routine method after fluoroscopy-guided TIVAD insertion mainly performed by venous cutdown. X-ray should be performed only in cases of clinical suspicion.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.