• Eur J Surg · Nov 1997

    Diagnostic decision support in suspected acute appendicitis: validation of a simplified scoring system.

    • G Fenyö, G Lindberg, P Blind, L Enochsson, and A Oberg.
    • Department of Surgery, Nacka Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. gyorgy.fenyo@kirurg.sos.sll.se
    • Eur J Surg. 1997 Nov 1; 163 (11): 831-8.

    ObjectiveTo validate a simplified scoring system as an aid to the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.DesignOpen prospective study.SettingCounty district hospital, and university hospital, Sweden.Subjects1167 Patients with suspected appendicitis.Main Outcome MeasuresCorrelation between scoring system and final diagnosis.ResultsA total of 475 patients were operated on and 392 (82.5%) of these had histologically verified appendicitis. The negative laparotomy rate was 17.5% (11.2% for men and 25.4% for women). The sensitivity of the scoring system for appendicitis at the main cut-off point (score -2 or more) was 0.73 and the specificity was 0.87. At the cut-off level (score - 17 or less) for predicting non-specific abdominal pain (NSAP) the proportion of correctly classified patients was 0.72 and the proportion of false negatives (patients with appendicitis classified as NSAP) was 0.14. Analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed that the scoring system performed slightly worse in the university hospital (area 0.83) than in the district hospital where it was originally developed (area 0.89).ConclusionThe scoring system was a valid instrument for discriminating between acute appendicitis and NSAP in the two centres studied. Use of the scoring system in daily clinical work was associated with a reduced rate of negative laparotomies.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…