-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Apr 1995
Comparative StudyLung function after open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
- L Gunnarsson, P Lindberg, L Tokics, O Thorstensson, and A Thörne.
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
- Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995 Apr 1; 39 (3): 302-6.
AbstractPostoperative lung function and gas exchange were studied in 36 patients after cholecystectomy. Twenty-four of the patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy while the remaining twelve were operated with open technique. Before surgery all patients had normal ventilatory volumes (forced vital capacity, FVC and forced expired volume in 1 s, FEV1) and normal gas exchange. Two hours postoperatively FVC was reduced to 64 +/- 16% (P < 0.05) of the preoperative level in the laparoscopic group and to 45 +/- 23% (P < 0.05) after open cholecystectomy. On the first postoperative day FVC was virtually normal in the laparoscopic patients (77 +/- 17% of preoperative level, NS), whereas the open surgery patients still had a decreased FVC (56 +/- 13% of preoperative, P < 0.05). FEV1 in the postoperative period followed the same course as FVC. Gas exchange was significantly impaired in the early postoperative period in all patients but no difference between the two groups was found. Two hours postoperatively PaO2 was reduced to 85% (P < 0.05) of preoperative value and PaCO2 had increased by 0.5 kPa (P < 0.05). The alveolo-arterial oxygen tension difference (PA-aO2) had increased by approximately 45% to a mean of 3.7 kPa (P < 0.05). On the first postoperative day gas exchange was still significantly impaired in the open surgery patients. Atelectasis detected by computed X-ray tomography of the lungs were found in both groups. However, the amount of atelectasis tended to be smaller in the laparoscopic group than in the open surgery patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.