• Anaesth Resusc Intensive Ther · Oct 1976

    Comparative Study

    Comparative studies of artificial respiration sets for babies and infants.

    • Z Rondio and M Rawicz.
    • Anaesth Resusc Intensive Ther. 1976 Oct 1; 4 (4): 273-9.

    AbstractIn experiments on appropriately modified manikins the action and effectiveness of artificial respiration sets for infants Penlon (British production) and Ambu (Danish production) were compared. The tidal volume, pressure and characteristics of respiratory phases, rebreathing, oxygen concentration, safety systems and their effect on ventilation were assessed. It was found that better ventilation parameters for the needs of resuscitation of newborns and babies can be obtained using the Ambu set, particularly when compliance is lower and bronchial resistance is higher. The Ambu set is simple, easy and safe to use.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.