• Dis. Colon Rectum · Sep 2015

    Outcomes After En Bloc Iliac Vessel Excision and Reconstruction During Pelvic Exenteration.

    • Kilian G M Brown, Cherry E Koh, Michael J Solomon, Raffi Qasabian, David Robinson, and Steven Dubenec.
    • 1 Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, Sydney Local Health District and Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 2 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 3 Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 4 Discipline of Surgery, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia 5 Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
    • Dis. Colon Rectum. 2015 Sep 1; 58 (9): 850-6.

    BackgroundAdvanced pelvic cancers involving the lateral pelvic compartment, and particularly the iliac vasculature, are difficult to manage. Common or external iliac vessel involvement has traditionally been considered a contraindication for curative surgery.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate pathological and surgical outcomes, particularly postoperative morbidity of pelvic exenteration with en bloc major iliac vascular excision and reconstruction.DesignThis study was a case series.SettingsThe study was conducted at a quaternary referral center for pelvic exenteration in Sydney.PatientsPatients included those undergoing en bloc iliac vessel excision as part of their pelvic exenteration for a locally advanced pelvic malignancy.Main Outcome MeasuresOver the study period, 336 patients underwent pelvic exenteration. Twenty-one patients (6.3%) underwent en bloc vascular excision of 29 vessels for tumor involvement. Twenty-four vessels required reconstruction. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and pathologic outcomes. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique.ResultsOperating time for patients who underwent vascular excision and reconstruction was longer, but this did not reach significance (631 vs 531 minutes; p = 0.052). Mean blood loss was significantly higher in the vascular excision and reconstruction group (6.8 vs 3.4 L; p < 0.001). Patients who required en bloc vascular excision were less likely to have R0 margins compared with patients who did not (38% vs 78%; p < 0.001). There was no intraoperative or 30-day mortality. Overall graft patency and limb loss at 1 year were 96% and 0%. A total of 52% of patients had at least 1 vascular related complication. Median overall and disease-free survival times were 34 and 26 months.LimitationsThis study is limited by a relatively small number of heterogeneous patients.ConclusionsEn bloc vascular resection and reconstruction for contiguous tumor involvement is feasible and safe in selected patients. Advanced pelvic tumors involving iliac vessels should not be precluded from curative surgery in specialized institutions.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…