-
Hepato Gastroenterol · May 2001
Comparative StudyDiagnosis and treatment of bleeding colonic diverticula.
- T Koperna, M Kisser, G Reiner, and F Schulz.
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Mistelbach Liechtensteinstrasse 67, A-2130 Mistelbach, Austria.
- Hepato Gastroenterol. 2001 May 1; 48 (39): 702-5.
Background/AimsColonic diverticula are the most frequent cause of major lower intestinal bleeding and pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the attending physician. Emergency surgical resection is associated with a high mortality and morbidity and patients who will stop bleeding spontaneously cannot be distinguished from those who will continue to bleed. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of barium enema as a sole less invasive treatment option for severe diverticular bleeding.MethodologyWe evaluated 102 patients admitted with colonic diverticular bleeding, from 1993 to 1997, who needed transfusion of 2 or more units of blood. We compared the clinical efficacy of surgical resection, conservative treatment, and therapeutic barium enema with regard to the cessation of bleeding, morbidity, mortality, and rebleeding rate. The therapeutic strategies used after further episodes of bleeding were also registered.ResultsTransfusion requirements were highest in patients who underwent surgical treatment, while the least amount of blood was required by the barium enema group (6.9 +/- 3.1 vs. 3.6 +/- 1.5 units of blood). However, the quantity of transfused blood did not correlate with the initial hemoglobin level, which was highest in the conservative treatment group and lowest in the operative group (9.0 +/- 1.2 vs. 8.1 +/- 1.3 g/dL). These data support the fact that the most severe bleeding would necessitate surgical resection and that therapeutic barium enema may be considered more effective than conservative treatments. With regard to the outcome of treatment, conservative treatment led to a rebleeding rate of 43.3%, which differed significantly from a 15.9% rebleeding rate after therapeutic barium enema (P = 0.009). No rebleeding was registered in surgically treated patients. Sixty percent of patients in whom therapeutic barium enema failed were treated by colonic resection without mortality, while 77% of patients who had rebleeding after conservative treatment were successfully treated with barium enema. Overall, barium enema was the most frequently applied second-line treatment (56.5%). The mortality after surgery was significantly higher than that after other treatment modalities (33% vs. 1%; P = 0.0001).ConclusionsIf diverticular bleeding is clinically suspected as the cause of major lower intestinal hemorrhage, barium enema is a more promising alternative than conservative treatment because of diagnostic and therapeutic importance in the long-term. In the event of urgent secondary surgery following the failure of barium enema to stop bleeding, we recommend a sigmoidoscopy and, optionally, an angiography before surgery in order to first localize the bleeding. We conclude that therapeutic barium enema is the treatment of choice for the first bleeding episode, while surgical resection should be performed if rebleeding occurs.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.