• Michal Kozanek, Mariano E Menendez, and David Ring.
• Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: kozanek.michael@mhg.harvard.edu.
• Injury. 2015 Feb 1;46(2):270-4.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between perioperative blood transfusion for proximal humerus fracture and inpatient mortality, adverse events, prolonged hospital stay, and nonroutine disposition.MethodsAmong the >55,000 patients with an operatively treated proximal humerus fracture identified in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2008 and 2011, 17% received a perioperative blood transfusion. Multivariable logistic regression analyses addressed the association of blood transfusion with inpatient mortality, adverse events, hospital stay, and nonroutine discharge, accounting for comorbidities and other known confounders.ResultsPerioperative blood transfusion for fracture of the proximal humerus was not associated with inhospital death, but it was independently associated with inpatient adverse events (odds ratio (OR) 4.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2-4.6), prolonged hospital stay (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.7-2.9), and increased nonroutine discharge (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-1.9).ConclusionsInpatients with fracture of the proximal humerus who receive transfusion are not more likely to die in hospital, but they do stay longer, experience more adverse events, and are less likely to be discharged home. Additional study is merited to determine if the judicious use of blood transfusion in the perioperative period can decrease inpatient morbidity and health-care resource utilisation.Level Of EvidenceLevel II, Retrospective Design, Prognosis Study.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

35 keywords...

hide…