• Andrew J Pearse, Gary J Hooper, Alastair G Rothwell, and Chris Frampton.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Christchurch School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
• J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec 1; 27 (10): 1827-31.

AbstractWe reviewed the revision rate and functional outcome of all patients who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after an osteotomy or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) on the New Zealand Joint Registry. We used these data to compare the results with primary TKA scores, including comparison of age-matched subgroups. There were 711 patients who had undergone TKA as salvage for a failed osteotomy with a revision rate of 1.33 per 100 component years and a mean 6-month Oxford Knee Score (OKS) of 36.9. There were 205 patients who had a failed UKA converted to TKA with a revision rate of 1.97 per 100 component years and a mean OKS of 29.1. The revision rates of TKA for both failed osteotomy and failed UKA were significantly poorer than after primary TKA (0.48 per 100 component years). The mean OKS after revision of a UKA was significantly poorer than both primary TKA and TKA for a failed osteotomy. There was no significant difference in mean OKS between primary TKA and TKA for a failed osteotomy, even among patients younger than 65 years. Revision of a failed osteotomy to a TKA has improved functional results compared with revision of a failed UKA. However, both yield poorer survivorship rates compared with primary TKA.Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…