• Aesthetic surgery journal · Mar 2010

    Separating the helix from the antihelix: a new concept in prominent ear correction.

    • Augusto Sette Câmara Valente.
    • augustoscvalente@gmail.com
    • Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Mar 1; 30 (2): 139-53.

    BackgroundFor over a century, various otoplasty techniques for correction of the prominent ear have been attempted. Nevertheless, cartilage memory strength, mainly in the thick cartilage (and consequently the recurrence of the prominence), still remains a problem. An additional difficulty relates to the antihelix irregularities caused by attempts to weaken the cartilage spring, which are time-consuming and in some cases lead to an unnatural-looking result.ObjectiveThe technique reported in this article represents a new approach to otoplasty that deconstructs the auricular pavilion with a single full incision in the antihelix. This approach makes it easier to rebuild the antihelical fold with dissolving sutures and allows repositioning of the helix and earlobe with a posterior bielliptical incision and a narrow bridge skin resection.MethodsBetween 1999 and 2009, the author performed otoplasty for correction of the prominent ear in 60 patients, including 32 men (53.3%) and 28 women (46.7%). A single incision was made in the superior and lateral borders of the antihelix from the triangular fossa down to the tail of the helix, to completely separate the antihelix from the helix. Three postauricular sutures were applied with nonpermanent side-to-side mattress sutures, with a fourth suture placed to reposition the tail of the helix. A posterior bielliptical incision with a narrow bridge skin resection was performed.ResultsComplications occurred in six of the 60 patients (10%) who underwent bilateral otoplasty. A discrete recurrence occurred in the superior pole in six patients (10%) and was unilateral in all cases. Follow-up ranged from three months to 10 years. There were no major recurrences in this series. The satisfaction rate was 98.3%. The antihelix looked smooth, without marks or irregularities; the helix seemed straight and well placed. The posterior scar was inconspicuous.ConclusionsThe present technique introduces a new concept in otoplasty that avoids handling the antihelix cartilage. A single incision of the antihelix breaks the cartilage spring memory completely and allows rebuilding of the antihelical fold without resorting to techniques such as rasping, drilling, excision, or complete incision, all of which are time-consuming and may result in irregularities. Sutures are placed to create the new antihelix in the desired shape easily and without tension. The helix and earlobe are repositioned with a specific posterior skin resection and with the tail of the helix's replacement.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…