• Sanjiva M Lutchmedial, Whitney G Creed, Alastair J Moore, Ryan R Walsh, George E Gentchos, and David A Kaminsky.
• Chest. 2015 Jul 1;148(1):176-84.

BackgroundCOPD has traditionally been defined by the presence of irreversible airflow limitation on spirometry using either the GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) or American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria (lower limit of normal [LLN]). We have observed that some patients with clinical COPD and emphysema on chest CT scan have no obstruction on spirometry. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of obstruction by GOLD and LLN criteria in patients with emphysema on CT scan and determine which radiographic criteria were associated with a clinical diagnosis of COPD.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical records and spirometry of all patients who had radiographically defined emphysema on chest CT scans completed at the University of Vermont in 2011. We compared spirometric criteria and CT scan factors with the presence of clinical COPD based on chart review.ResultsWe identified 274 patients with CT scan-defined emphysema. GOLD criteria detected obstruction in 228 patients (83%), and LLN detected obstruction in 206 patients (75%). However, GOLD failed to correctly identify 19 patients (6.9%) and LLN failed to identify 38 patients (13.9%) (average 10.4%) who had radiographic emphysema and a clinical diagnosis of COPD. Obese patients had a lower prevalence of obstruction whether classified by LLN or GOLD. Among patients with spirometric obstruction, there were greater degrees of emphysema and more severely increased airway wall thickness. Factors that were independently associated with clinical COPD were lower FVC % predicted, lower FEV1/FVC ratio, and increasing airway wall thickness.ConclusionsSpirometry missed 10.4% of patients with clinical COPD who have significant emphysema on chest CT scan.

32 keywords...

hide…