• J Bone Joint Surg Am · Nov 2014

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty in the same patients.

    • Young-Hoo Kim and Jang-Won Park.
    • The Joint Replacement Center, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, MokDong Hospital, 911-1, MokDong, YangChun-Ku, Seoul, Republic of Korea (158-710). E-mail address for Y.-H. Kim: younghookim@ewha.ac.kr.
    • J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Nov 5; 96 (21): 1807-13.

    BackgroundWe are not aware of any information on in vivo clinical results at a minimum of five years after posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasties performed with a highly cross-linked polyethylene insert. The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether the clinical and radiographic results of posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses, including the prevalences of fracture of the polyethylene post, failure of the locking mechanism of the tibial polyethylene insert, and osteolysis, would be similar between patients treated with conventional polyethylene and those treated with highly cross-linked polyethylene.MethodsThree hundred and eight patients with a mean age of 60.3 years (range, twenty-two to sixty-five years) received a posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prosthesis with a conventional polyethylene tibial insert in one knee and the same prosthesis with a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert in the contralateral knee. Twenty patients were men and 288 were women. The mean duration of follow-up was 5.9 years (range, five to 6.8 years). At each follow-up visit, the patients were assessed radiographically and clinically with the rating system of the Knee Society; the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score.ResultsThe two groups did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) with regard to the mean postoperative Knee Society total knee scores (93.5 compared with 93.7 points), function scores (82.9 compared with 82.7 points), and pain scores (46.7 compared with 47.1 points); WOMAC scores (16 compared with 15 points); range of motion (129.7° compared with 130.1°); or patient satisfaction assessed with a visual analog scale (7.6 compared with 7.9 points). The mean UCLA activity score was 6.4 points (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to radiographic results. No knee in either group had a fracture of the tibial polyethylene post or failure of the locking mechanism of the tibial polyethylene insert. No knee in either group had osteolysis. One knee (0.3%), treated with highly cross-linked polyethylene, was revised because of infection.ConclusionsThe data suggest that clinical and radiographic findings at five years after posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty were the same for the patients treated with highly cross-linked polyethylene and those treated with conventional polyethylene.Copyright © 2014 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.