• Am. J. Crit. Care · Jan 2015

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Manual vs Automated Lateral Rotation to Reduce Preventable Pulmonary Complications in Ventilator Patients.

    • Sandra K Hanneman, Gary M Gusick, Shannan K Hamlin, Sheryln J Wachtel, Stanley G Cron, Deborah J Jones, and Sandra A Oldham.
    • Sandra K. Hanneman is the Jerold B. Katz Distinguished Professor for Nursing Research at University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Nursing. Gary M. Gusick is a clinical nurse specialist in cardiovascular and transplant nursing at St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas. Shannan K. Hamlin is program director of nursing research and evidence-based practice at Houston Methodist Texas Medical Center. Sheryln J. Wachtel is director of innovation and research at CHRISTUS Spohn Health System, Corpus Christi, Texas. Stanley G. Cron is a research instructor and statistician and Deborah J. Jones is an assistant professor and assistant dean for undergraduate programs at University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Nursing. Sandra A. Oldham is a professor of radiology at University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School. Sandra.K.Hanneman@uth.tmc.edu.
    • Am. J. Crit. Care. 2015 Jan 1;24(1):24-32.

    PurposeTo estimate effect sizes for a trial to compare preventable pulmonary complications (PPCs), turning-related adverse events, mechanical ventilation duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and ICU mortality between patients randomized to 2-hourly manual or continuous automated lateral rotation.MethodsRandomized controlled trial pilot study with 15 patients selected randomly from eligible medical-surgical ICU patients from 2 tertiary hospitals and assigned randomly to the manual-turn or automated-turn protocol for up to 7 consecutive days. A radiologist blinded to group and site assessed serial chest radiographs for PPCs. Repeated-measures analysis with linear mixed models was used to estimate change in PPC score, and Wilcoxon rank sum or Fisher exact test was used to compare group differences in the secondary outcomes.ResultsOf 16 patients enrolled, 12 (75%) completed the study. Data from 15 patients, 7 manual turn and 8 automated turn, were analyzed. Between-group differences in PPC incidence (67% overall), change in PPC score (β = 0.15, manual turn and β = -0.44, automated turn), and secondary outcomes were not significant (P > .05). Standardized effect sizes were small to moderate for the outcome variables. A sample size of 54 patients would be needed to detect statistically significant between-group differences in PPC over time.ConclusionsThe incidence of PPCs in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation in a medical-surgical ICU was high. Automated turning decreased PPCs with time but had little effect on secondary outcomes. Safety outcomes were not substantially different between groups. A modest efficacy effect supported reduced PPCs with automated turning to the lateral position.©2015 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.