-
World journal of urology · Jan 1996
ReviewContemporary criteria for cadaveric organ donation in renal transplantation: the need for better selection parameters.
- R J Taylor and J S Engelsgjerd.
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-2360, USA.
- World J Urol. 1996 Jan 1; 14 (4): 225-9.
AbstractA major problem facing transplantation is the disparity between the availability of cadaver donors and the number of recipients awaiting transplantation. Efforts to deal with this issue have involved the use of "marginal donors." Results obtained using these organs have often been significantly worse at 1 and 3 years of follow-up. The problem of how to select and utilize these donors is of critical importance to both patients and society. Current criteria available for assessing cadaver donors are based on ideal donors. Although these appear adequate for predicting the results for the ideal donor, they are not adequate for assessing results for marginal donors. New criteria are of critical importance for better utilization of these organs. The purpose of this review is to examine the current criteria for ideal and marginal donors, review the critical issues to be clarified, and discuss options for improvement results in the future.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.