• Injury · May 2015

    Comparative Study

    Massive transfusion prediction with inclusion of the pre-hospital Shock Index.

    • Alexander Olaussen, Evan L Peterson, Biswadev Mitra, Gerard O'Reilly, Paul A Jennings, and Mark Fitzgerald.
    • Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Monash University, Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Australia; Trauma Service, The Alfred Hospital, Australia; Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Australia. Electronic address: alexander.olaussen@monash.edu.
    • Injury. 2015 May 1; 46 (5): 822-6.

    BackgroundDetecting occult bleeding can be challenging and may delay resuscitation. The Shock Index (SI) defined as heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure has attracted attention. Prediction models using combinations of pre-hospital SI (phSI) and the trauma centre SI (tcSI) values may be effective in identifying patients requiring massive blood transfusions (MT).AimTo explore whether combinations of the phSI and the tcSI augment MT prediction.MethodsThe scores were retrospectively developed using all major trauma patients that presented to The Alfred Hospital between 2006 and 2012. The first PH and TC observations were used. To avoid exclusion of the 'sickest' patients, the SI was imputed to 2 where SBP was missing, but HR was present. We developed 4 models. (i) 'Dichotomised', defined as positive when both phSI and tcSI were ≥1. (ii) 'Formulaic', defined by logistic regression analysis. (iii) 'Combination', defined pragmatically based on the logistic regression. (iv) 'Trending', defined as: tcSI minus phSI.ResultsThere were 6990 major trauma patients and 360 (5.2%) received MT. There were 1371 cases with either phSI or tcSI missing and were thus excluded from the analysis. The 'Dichotomised' had higher positive predictive value than the tcSI with a further 5 per 100 patients identified. The 'Formulaic' model, defined as: log Odds (MT)=2.16×tcSI+0.89×phSI-5.42, and the 'Combination' model, defined as: phSI×0.5+tcSI, performed equally (AUROC 0.83 versus 0.83, χ(2)=0.86, p=0.35). The 'Formulaic' performed marginally, but statistically significantly, more accurate than the tcSI alone (AUROC 0.83 versus 0.82, χ(2)=6.89, p<0.01). An 'Upward Trending' SI was observed in 1758 patients, revealing a 4.6-fold univariate association with MT (OR 4.55; 95%CI 2.64-7.83), and an AUROC of 0.79 (95%CI 0.74-0.83). The 'Downward Trending' SI was protective against MT (OR 0.44; 95%CI 0.34-0.57).ConclusionThe initial pre-hospital SI is associated with MT. However, this relationship did not clinically augment MT decision when combined with the in-hospital SI. The simplicity of the SI makes it a favourable option to explore further. Computer-assisted technology in data capturing, analysis and prognostication presents avenues for further research.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…