-
Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Jun 2013
Randomized Controlled TrialLumbar multifidus muscle thickness does not predict patients with low back pain who improve with trunk stabilization exercises.
- Kristen A Zielinski, Sharon M Henry, Rebecca H Ouellette-Morton, and Michael J DeSarno.
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
- Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jun 1; 94 (6): 1132-8.
ObjectiveTo understand lumbar multifidus (LM) muscle activation as a clinical feature to predict patients with low back pain (LBP) who are likely to benefit from stabilization (STB) exercises.DesignProspective, cohort study.SettingOutpatient physical therapy clinics.ParticipantsPersons with LBP were recruited for this study. Subjects (N=25) were classified as either eligible to receive STB exercises or ineligible on the basis of current clinical prediction rules.InterventionsSix weeks of STB treatment.Main Outcome MeasuresBefore and after treatment, subjects underwent rehabilitative ultrasound imaging to quantify LM-muscle activation and completed disability and pain questionnaires. Analyses were performed to examine the (1) relation between LM-muscle activation and current clinical features used to predict patients with LBP likely to benefit from STB exercises, (2) LM-muscle activation between the STB-eligible and STB-ineligible groups before and after STB treatment, and (3) relation between LM-muscle activation before STB treatment and (a) disability and (b) pain outcomes after treatment for both groups.ResultsNo relation was found between LM-muscle activation and the number of clinical features. Before STB treatment, LM-muscle activation between the STB-eligible and STB-ineligible groups did not differ. After STB treatment, LM-muscle activation differed between the groups; however, this interaction was because the LM-muscle activation for the STB-eligible group decreased after treatment while that for the STB-ineligible group increased after treatment. Finally, only the STB-eligible group had a significant reduction in disability following treatment; however, no relation was found between LM-muscle activation before treatment and (a) disability or (b) pain outcomes after treatment in the STB-eligible group.ConclusionsLM-muscle activation does not appear to be a clinical feature that predicts patients with LBP likely to benefit from STB exercises.Copyright © 2013 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.