• Kyung-Jin Song, Byung-Wan Choi, Gyu-Hyung Kim, and Ji-Hun Song.
• Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
• Spine J. 2010 Jan 1; 10 (1): 50-7.

Background ContextEven though many clinical reports about cages have been documented in patients with degenerative disorders, reports were scarce for traumatic injury cases, and those cases using metal cages were restricted to only one-level injury.PurposeTo evaluate the usefulness of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage and plate construction in anterior interbody fusions (AIF) for traumatic cervical spine injuries by analyzing radiographic changes and clinical outcomes.Study Design/SettingRetrospective study.Patient SampleFifty-eight patients (91 levels) underwent cage and plate construction for treatment of traumatic cervical spine injury.Outcome MeasuresThe fusion rate, fusion time, changes of Cobb angle, subsidence rate, and adjacent level changes were assessed as a radiographic outcome. Clinical analysis includes the recovery rate on the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale and the presence of the complications.MethodsWe evaluated 58 patients (91 levels) who underwent surgery and had at least 24 months in follow-up study. Radiographic evaluation included the assessment of interbody fusion rate, fusion time, changes of Cobb angle, subsidence rate, and adjacent level changes. Clinical assessment was done by analyzing recovery state of ASIA impairment scale from preoperative period to the last follow-up and by evaluating complications.ResultsFifty-four cases showed bony fusion within 3 months after the surgery. The mean Cobb angle between the vertebral bodies was 2.54 degrees before operation, 9.13 degrees after operation, and 8.39 degrees at the latest follow-up. The mean intervertebral disc height was increased by 3.01 mm after the operation, but the mean height was 2.17 mm shorter at the last follow-up than after postoperation. In terms of clinical results, five Grade A cases and one Grade B case as assessed by the ASIA impairment scale were unchanged until the last follow-up. Twenty-three cases of Grade C, 16 cases of Grade D, and 13 cases of Grade E improved to seven cases, 26 cases, and 19 cases, respectively. Three cases went through additional surgery, two posterior fusions for delayed union and posterior instability and one AIF for adjacent level disease.ConclusionThe PEEK cage and additional plate fixation is a surgical procedure that decreases donor site morbidity, obtains high fusion rate with rigid fixation, and provides satisfactory clinical outcome for traumatic cervical spine injuries, regardless of the numbers of the involved levels.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

27 keywords...

hide…