• R O Cummins, M S Eisenberg, L Bergner, A Hallstrom, T Hearne, and J A Murray.
• Ann Emerg Med. 1984 Sep 1; 13 (9 Pt 2): 798-801.

AbstractMany recent efforts to improve emergency medical services (EMS) and increase survival rates are simply efforts to get defibrillation to patients as rapidly as possible. In the 1960s physicians traveled in mobile coronary care units to bring the defibrillator to cardiac arrest patients. Later, paramedics, rather than physicians, were used. During the late 1970s the concept of early out-of-hospital defibrillation expanded as emergency medical technicians (EMTs) learned to defibrillate. Researchers in several settings confirmed the effectiveness of early defibrillation by EMTs. The automatic detection of ventricular fibrillation (VF) creates new opportunities for the early defibrillation concept. This includes both automatic implantable defibrillators and automatic external defibrillators (AED). The King County, Washington, EMS is conducting two projects to evaluate AEDs. One is a randomized, controlled crossover study in which EMTs use either an AED or a standard manual defibrillator. Outcome measurements include time to countershock, conversion rates, and survival rates. In the second project family members of patients who have survived out-of-hospital VF randomly receive an AED and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instruction, or CPR instruction alone. This study was designed to determine whether family members can be trained adequately to use the device effectively. Psychological tests measure the effect of learning about, living with, and using such technology. These studies may help define the role of AEDs in the future management of out-of-hospital VF.

8 keywords...

hide…