• Michael Y Wang and Srinath Samudrala.
• Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033, USA. myw@usc.edu
• Neurosurgery. 2004 Jun 1; 54 (6): 1436-9; discussion 1439-40.

ObjectiveAtlantal lateral mass screws provide an alternative to C1/C2 transarticular screws and, in some cases, can obviate the need for extending a fusion to the occiput. For these reasons, C1 lateral mass screws are becoming increasingly popular. However, the critical local anatomy and unfamiliarity with this new technique can make C1 screw placement more challenging.MethodsMorphometric analysis was performed on 74 cadaveric spines obtained from the Department of Anatomy at the Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California. Critical measurements were determined for screw entry points, trajectories, and lengths for application of the technique described by Harms and Melcher.ResultsThe mean height and width for screw entry on the posterior surface of the lateral mass were 3.9 and 7.3 mm, respectively. The maximum medialized screw trajectory ranged from 25 to 45 degrees (mean, 33 degrees). The mean maximal screw length to obtain bicortical purchase was 22.5 mm, and the mean minimum screw depth was 14.4 mm. Screw depths varied on the basis of the entry point, trajectory, and vertebral morphology. The overhang of the posterior arch averaged 11.4 mm (range, 6.9-17 mm). All specimens could accommodate 3.5-mm lateral mass screws bilaterally with proper preparation of the entry site.ConclusionSignificant variations in the morphology of C1 exist. However, the large size of the atlantal lateral mass makes screw placement forgiving. Preoperative computed tomographic scans and intraoperative fluoroscopy are useful in guiding proper screw placement. Close attention should be paid to preparation of the screw entry site.

16 keywords...

hide…