• Neurology · Feb 2002

    Review Comparative Study

    Diagnostic criteria used in studies of reflex sympathetic dystrophy.

    • W J T van de Beek, R J Schwartzman, S I van Nes, E M Delhaas, and J J van Hilten.
    • Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
    • Neurology. 2002 Feb 26; 58 (4): 522-6.

    ObjectiveAssessment of the diagnostic criteria of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) and evaluation of the impact of the introduction of the diagnostic criteria of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) on the international application of diagnostic criteria of RSD.MethodsRandomized controlled trials and clinical investigations, published between January 1980 and June 2000, were evaluated with regard to the applied diagnostic criteria of RSD.ResultsOne hundred seven studies were identified. Thirty-four of these studies were excluded because of inadequate reporting of diagnostic criteria. The 73 included studies were not homogeneous with regard to the diagnostic criteria because they applied many different aspects of sensory and autonomic features. Only 12% of the studies considered the presence of motor features, mostly vaguely described, as mandatory for the diagnosis RSD. Although 10 of the 23 studies published since the introduction of CRPS have applied this term, only 3 used the exact criteria without additions or other modifications.ConclusionDiagnostic criteria sets of RSD focus on many different aspects of sensory and autonomic features that generally are described vaguely. This has not changed since the introduction of the CPRS criteria. These findings question whether the current criteria adequately define RSD.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…