• J Garnacho-Montero, E Fernández-Mondéjar, R Ferrer-Roca, M E Herrera-Gutiérrez, J A Lorente, S Ruiz-Santana, and A Artigas.
• Unidad Clínica de Cuidados Críticos y Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBIS), Sevilla, España. Electronic address: jgarnachom@gmail.com.
• Med Intensiva. 2015 Jun 1; 39 (5): 303-15.

AbstractFluid resuscitation is essential for the survival of critically ill patients in shock, regardless of the origin of shock. A number of crystalloids and colloids (synthetic and natural) are currently available, and there is strong controversy regarding which type of fluid should be administered and the potential adverse effects associated with the use of these products, especially the development of renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy. Recently, several clinical trials and metaanalyses have suggested the use of hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) to be associated with an increased risk of death and kidney failure, and data have been obtained showing clinical benefit with the use of crystalloids that contain a lesser concentration of sodium and chlorine than normal saline. This new information has increased uncertainty among clinicians regarding which type of fluid should be used. We therefore have conducted a review of the literature with a view to developing practical recommendations on the use of fluids in the resuscitation phase in critically ill adults. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier España, S.L.U. and SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.

48 keywords...

hide…