-
Journal of critical care · Jun 2015
Observational StudyPredictive models of prolonged mechanical ventilation yield moderate accuracy.
- Juan B Figueroa-Casas, Alok K Dwivedi, Sean M Connery, Raphael Quansah, Lowell Ellerbrook, and Juan Galvis.
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX. Electronic address: Juan.Figueroa@ttuhsc.edu.
- J Crit Care. 2015 Jun 1;30(3):502-5.
PurposeTo develop a model to predict prolonged mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of its initiation.Materials And MethodsIn 282 general intensive care unit patients, multiple variables from the first 2 days on mechanical ventilation and their total ventilation duration were prospectively collected. Three models accounting for early deaths were developed using different analyses: (a) multinomial logistic regression to predict duration > 7 days vs duration ≤ 7 days alive vs duration ≤ 7 days death; (b) binary logistic regression to predict duration > 7 days for the entire cohort and for survivors only, separately; and (c) Cox regression to predict time to being free of mechanical ventilation alive.ResultsPositive end-expiratory pressure, postoperative state (negatively), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were independently associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. The multinomial regression model yielded an accuracy (95% confidence interval) of 60% (53%-64%). The binary regression models yielded accuracies of 67% (61%-72%) and 69% (63%-75%) for the entire cohort and for survivors, respectively. The Cox regression model showed an equivalent to area under the curve of 0.67 (0.62-0.71).ConclusionsDifferent predictive models of prolonged mechanical ventilation in general intensive care unit patients achieve a moderate level of overall accuracy, likely insufficient to assist in clinical decisions.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.