• Giuseppe Citerio, Mauro Oddo, and Fabio Silvio Taccone.
• aDepartment of Health Science, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza bNeurointensive Care, Department of Emergency and Intensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy cDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, CHUV-Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland dDepartment of Intensive Care, Hopital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium.
• Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015 Apr 1;21(2):113-9.

Purpose Of ReviewMultimodal monitoring (MMM) is routinely applied in neurointensive care. Unfortunately, there is no robust evidence on which MMM-derived physiologic variables are the most clinically relevant, how and when they should be monitored, and whether MMM impacts outcome. The complexity is even higher because once the data are continuously collected, interpretation and integration of these complex physiologic events into targeted individualized care is still embryonic.Recent FindingsRecent clinical investigation mainly focused on intracranial pressure, perfusion of the brain, and oxygen availability along with electrophysiology. Moreover, a series of articles reviewing the available evidence on all the MMM tools, giving practical recommendations for bedside MMM, has been published, along with other consensus documents on the role of neuromonitoring and electroencephalography in this setting.SummaryMMM allows comprehensive exploration of the complex pathophysiology of acute brain damage and, depending on the different configuration of the pathological condition we are treating, the application of targeted individualized care. Unfortunately, we still lack robust evidence on how to better integrate MMM-derived information at the bedside to improve patient management. Advanced informatics is promising and may provide us a supportive tool to interpret physiologic events and guide pathophysiological-based therapeutic decisions.

21 keywords...

hide…