-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2015
Comparative StudyA Comparative Analysis of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine Effects on Human Cardiac SCN5A Channels.
- Alexander P Schwoerer, Hanno Scheel, and Patrick Friederich.
- From the *Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research)-Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Hamburg, Germany; †Department of Anesthesiology, German Armed Forces Hospital Hamburg, Academic Hospital of University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; and ‡Department of Anaesthesiology, Bogenhausen Hospital, Academic Hospital of Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany.
- Anesth. Analg.. 2015 Jun 1;120(6):1226-34.
BackgroundIntoxication with local anesthetics may induce cardiac arrhythmias by interaction with ion channels. Ropivacaine has been introduced into clinical anesthesia as a safer alternative to bupivacaine, which is associated with a relatively high risk of cardiac arrhythmias. Diverging safety profiles may result from differences in the mode of interaction with cardiac Na(+) channels. We conducted this study to test this hypothesis and to provide experimental basis for the ongoing discussion regarding the cardiotoxic profiles of these local anesthetics.MethodsThe influence of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on the electrophysiological properties of Na(+) channels was investigated in human embryonic kidney-293 cells stably transfected with SCN5A channels cloned from the human heart using the patch-clamp technique in the outside-out configuration.ResultsOpen-channel block of SCN5A channels was concentration dependent, with bupivacaine being approximately 4.5-fold more potent than ropivacaine (IC50 = 69.5 ± 8.2 μM vs IC50 = 322.2 ± 29.9 μM). Both drugs influenced the voltage dependency of channel activation and steady-state inactivation by shifting the membrane potential of half-maximal activation/inactivation toward somewhat more negative membrane potentials. In their inactivated state, SCN5A channels were slightly more sensitive toward bupivacaine than toward ropivacaine (IC50 = 2.18 ± 0.16 μM vs IC50 = 2.73 ± 0.27 μM). Blockade of inactivated channels developed in a concentration-dependent manner, with comparable time constants for both drugs, whereas recovery from block was approximately 2-fold faster for ropivacaine than for bupivacaine.ConclusionsHuman cardiac Na(+) channels show state-dependent inhibition by ropivacaine, and the mode of interaction is comparable to that of bupivacaine. Therefore, modest differences in cardiotoxicity between these local anesthetic drugs are compatible with subtle differences in their interaction with human cardiac Na(+) channels.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.