• Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Mar 2001

    Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals.

    • K M Hall, T Bushnik, B Lakisic-Kazazic, J Wright, and A Cantagallo.
    • Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA.
    • Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar 1; 82 (3): 367-74.

    ObjectivesTo determine which outcome measures are best and least suited for assessing long-term functional outcome of individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the community.DesignSurvey of participants in the community an average of 5 years after TBI. A battery of outcome measures was given.SettingCommunity in northern California after inpatient rehabilitation.ParticipantsForty-eight adult individuals with prior moderate to severe TBI. All subjects had received inpatient rehabilitation 2 to 9 years previously and could be reached for telephone interview.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Community Integration Questionnaire, Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory (NFI), Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS), Level of Cognitive Functioning Scale (LCFS), FIM instrument, Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM), Supervision Rating Scale (SRS), Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Revised Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (R-CHART), and Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The number of maximal scores on each of the surveys was studied to determine which instruments continued to reveal deficits years after TBI.ResultsMost individuals obtained maximum scores, ie, functional independence, on these scales: LCFS, FIM motor subscale and total score, R-CHART physical independence subscale, FIM+FAM, GOS, and the SRS. Measures with the fewest maximum scores (<36%, measuring deficits still extant in the group) were the R-CHART cognition subscale and the NFI memory/attention and communication subscales, and employment subscales. Items, subscales, and total scores that showed good variability and correlated most highly and frequently with other scales also demonstrating good variability were the PCRS, the DRS and FIM+FAM employment items, the R-CHART cognition subscale, and the NFI motor, memory/attention, communication, and depression subscales (the R-CHART cognition subscale and NFI memory/attention subscale were highly correlated with the PCRS;.84,.83).ConclusionsMeasures that appeared to contribute little to assessing functional status of a TBI sample years postinjury were the FIM, FIM+FAM, SRS, GOS, and LCFS. Measures that showed a range of deficits across participants were DRS employability, the NFI, PCRS, and the R-CHART cognition subscale.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…