• M Kawai, A Sakai, S Takaori, A Hiura, N Sakata, M Nakashima, and T Miyamoto.
• Department of Respiratory Disease, Kouseikai-Takaori Hospital Medical Corporation, Kyoto, Japan. chest3@bb.excite.co.jp
• Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jul 1; 27 (6): 385-9.

AbstractTherapeutic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler (Meptin DPI) and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler (Meptin MDI), the currently marketed formulation, was assessed in 16 patients with bronchial asthma. The study was conducted in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner, using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) as an index of bronchodilatory effect. In Period I, the patients received 20 mcg of either Meptin DPI or Meptin MDI, and then crossed over in Period II after a washout interval of 3--28 days. Pharmacodynamic equivalence was accessed using AUC (FEV1)/h and peak FEV1 as indices, and the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Factors used for the analysis were the treatment group and/or carryover effect, patients within each group, period, and treatment. The 90% confidence intervals for the differences between the two treatments were --0.0995 to --0.0204 (L) for mean AUC (FEV1)/h and --0.102 to --0.022 (L) for mean peak FEV1, both within the acceptance criteria of --0.15 to 0.15 (L). Meptin DPI was therefore assessed as being equivalent to the current Meptin MDI.(c) 2005 Prous Science. All rights reserved.

26 keywords...

hide…