• Dorien M van der Eng, Niels W L Schep, and Tim Schepers.
• Physician, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.m.vandereng@hotmail.com.
• J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jul 1; 54 (4): 657-62.

AbstractAnkle fractures with syndesmotic rupture require operative treatment. In most cases, this consists of fixation of the tibiofibular joint with 1 or more screws. Bioabsorbable screws are used for the same purpose but have the advantage that screw removal is unnecessary. The aim of the present study was to compare the results of bioabsorbable and metallic syndesmotic screws. A systematic search was performed in the Ovid MEDLINE electronic database and Google Scholar. Three randomized controlled trials and one comparison study, with 260 patients, were included. The experimental group consisted of patients with syndesmotic injuries treated with bioabsorbable screws versus the control group (patients treated with metallic screws). The primary outcomes were complications and wound infections. No statistically significant difference was demonstrable in the overall number of complications between the 2 groups. In the group of patients with a bioabsorbable screw, 32 of 137 (23.4%) experienced a complication versus 7 of 123 patients (5.7%) with a metallic screw. Data on wound-related complications showed no statistically significant difference, 19.7% versus 5.7%. The average maximum range of motion in both groups was comparable. Bioabsorbable syndesmotic screws and metallic syndesmotic screws were comparable with respect to the incidence of complications and range of motion. However, the absolute number of complications was greater with bioabsorbable screws.Copyright © 2015 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…