• Can. Respir. J. · Sep 2006

    The value of thoracic computed tomography scans in clinical diagnosis: a prospective study.

    • Mark O Turner, John R Mayo, Nestor L Müller, Michael Schulzer, and J Mark FitzGerald.
    • Respiratory Division, University of British Columbia and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver Coastal research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia.
    • Can. Respir. J. 2006 Sep 1; 13 (6): 311-6.

    BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) scans are used extensively to investigate chest disease because of their cross-sectional perspective and superior contrast resolution compared with chest radiographs. These advantages lead to a more accurate imaging assessment of thoracic disease. The actual use and evaluation of the clinical impact of thoracic CT has not been assessed since scanners became widely available.ObjectiveTo identify patterns of utilization, waiting times and the impact of CT scan results on clinical diagnoses.DesignA before and after survey of physicians who had ordered thoracic CT scans.SettingVancouver General Hospital--a tertiary care teaching centre in Vancouver, British Columbia.SubjectsPhysicians who had ordered CT scans.InterventionPhysicians completed a standard questionnaire before and after the CT scan result was available.MeasurementsChanges in the clinical diagnosis, estimates of the probabilities for the diagnosis both before and after the CT scan, and waiting times.ResultsFour hundred fifty-four thoracic CT cases had completed questionnaires, of whom 80% were outpatients. A change in diagnosis was made in 48% of cases (25% with a normal CT scan and 23% with CT scan findings that indicated a different diagnosis). The largest change in probability scores for the clinical diagnosis before and after the CT scan was 43.9% for normal scans, while it was 36.3% for a different diagnosis and 26.3% for the same diagnosis. High-priority scans were associated with decreased waiting time (--7.89 days for each unit increase in priority).ConclusionsThe CT scan results were associated with a change in diagnosis in 48% of cases. Normal scans constituted 25% of the total and had the greatest impact scores. Waiting times were highly correlated with increased urgency of the presenting problem.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.